Please provide details here for which platform editions are being targeted by this JSR, and how this JSR has considered the relationship with the other platform editions. This specification is targeted for Java SE 8 or higher and Java EE 8 or higher platforms.Ģ.3 The Executive Committees would like to ensure JSR submitters think about how their proposed technology relates to all of the Java platform editions. ?Ğvaluating any requirements necessary to support the use of JAX-RS resource classes as controllers in the MVC 1.0 JSR.Ģ.2 What is the target Java platform? (i.e., desktop, server, personal, embedded, card, etc.) ? Investigating the reactive programming paradigm as a way to improve the JAX-RS asynchronous client API. ?ěuilding upon the hypermedia API added in version 2.0. ? Making JAXB conditional on runtimes where it is available.
?Ğvaluating ways in which declarative security can be supported either directly in this JSR or by leveraging other EE-platform JSRs. ?Ğxploring support for non-blocking I/O in providers (filters, interceptors, etc.). In summary, the following is a list of the tasks in scope for JAX-RS 2.1:
Thus, support for non-blocking I/O is necessary to achieve high throughput and efficiently manage resources like threads. If only blocking I/O is available, asynchronous processing simply pushes the problem from one thread to the next -this is akin to borrowing from a person to pay another, the problem is not really solved, only deferred. However, asynchronous processing alone cannot deliver on all the promises of a modern architecture without the help of non-blocking I/O. JAX-RS 2.0 introduced the notion of asynchronous processing for both the client and the server APIs. It is commonly employed for one-way streaming data transmissions in which a server updates a client periodically or every time an event takes place. Server-Sent Events (SSE) is a new technology defined as part of the HTML5 set of recommendations for a client (e.g., a browser) to automatically get updates from a server via HTTP. Name of Contact Person: Santiago Pericas-GeertsenĮ-Mail Address: santiago.pericasgeertsen Number: +1 5Į-Mail Addresses: santiago.pericasgeertsen marek.potociar Numbers: +1 5, +420 221 438 874Ģ.1 Please describe the proposed Specification: Original Java Specification Request (JSR) Specification Leads: Santiago Pericas-Geertsen, Marek Potociar, OracleĮ-Mail Addresses: santiago.pericasgeertsen pavel.bucek Numbers: +1 5, +420 221 438 041 Pavel Bucek has replaced Marek Potociar as one of the Specification Leads. Q2 2017 Public Review | Proposed Final Draft 26, 2021 Ronald Cortes, Contributorįredericksburg (9-4) vs.The following updates have been made to the original proposal:Ģ.12 Please describe the anticipated schedule for the development of this Fredericksburg defeated Pleasanton 28-20 to advance in Division 4A Regional Finals at Farris Stadium on Friday, Nov. Playoff record: Austin Lake Travis (63-12), Brennan (18-10)īest finish: Austin Lake Travis (State champion – 6 times), Brennan (State final)įredericksburg quarterback Cole Immel #10 celebrates with teammate Logan Metzger at the end of the game. Total playoff appearances: Austin Lake Travis (19), Brennan (11) 4, Tiger Stadium, Dripping Springsįirst playoff appearance: Austin Lake Travis – 2000, Brennan – 2011 Austin Lake Travis (11-2)Ģ p.m., Saturday, Dec. Playoff record: Burton (23-14), Falls City (74-33-2)īest finish: Burton (State semifinals – 3 times), Falls City (State champion)īrennan (13-0) vs. Total playoff appearances: Burton (15), Falls City (36) Most recent meeting: 2018, Falls City won 30-28įirst playoff appearance: Burton – 1992, Falls City – 1950
Playoff record: Poth (46-35), Franklin (42-32-2)īest finish: Poth (State final), Franklin (State final – 2 times)ħ p.m., Friday, Dec. Total playoff appearances: Poth (38), Franklin (34) 3, The Pfield, Pflugervilleįirst playoff appearance: Poth – 1940, Franklin – 1951 Playoff record: Navarro (30-21), Cuero (102-39)īest finish: Navarro (State semifinals), Cuero (State champion – 4 times)ħ p.m., Friday, Dec. Total playoff appearances: Navarro (22), Cuero (44) Most recent meeting: 2021, Navarro won 29-27įirst playoff appearance: Navarro – 1982, Cuero – 1928 Playoff record: Alamo Heights (35-29-1), Liberty Hill (53-19-4)īest finish: Alamo Heights (State champion), Liberty Hill (State champion – 2 times)ħ:30 p.m., Friday, Dec. Total playoff appearances: Alamo Heights (31), Liberty Hill (22) 3, Bobcat Stadium, San Marcosįirst playoff appearance: Alamo Heights – 1936, Liberty Hill – 1984 Alamo Heights defeated Boerne Champion 21-16 on Friday, Oct. Alamo Heights defensive back Manny Harris celebrates at the end of the game.
0 kommentar(er)
